Graylog 5.0.7 says connection refused but works if I use /graylog/ context path

Hello There,

I am using Graylog 5.0.7 along with MongoDB 5.0.12 and Opensearch 2.0.1 and it has been configured to one of our application , when I click from our application page it gives connection refused but when I access with http://mydomain.com/graylog/ it works fine,

I did inspect of page and it give below error
Refused to display ‘https://mydomain.com/’ in a frame because it set multiple ‘X-Frame-Options’ headers with conflicting values (‘SAMEORIGIN, DENY’). Falling back to ‘deny’.

i have bind address configured as 0.0.0.0:9000 , also we are using any proxy

can you please let me know if anything can be done so that if I click on graylog icon from my page it should open, this was working scenario when I was using Graylog 4.3.3

Anything has changed from 4.3.3 to 5.0.7 with respect to accessing graylog

Please guide,

Regards,
SAM

Can you clarify what this means: “it has been configured to one of our application , when I click from our application page it gives connection refused”

Are you embedding the graylog web interface page in an html frame?

I did a bit of digging and found a http_allow_embedding server configuration option (configured via server.conf)

While i didn’t find this value on the Server.conf documentation page, I did find it on the Upgrading to Graylog 5.0.x page.

To prevent click-jacking, we are now preventing the frontend from being embedded in <frame> /<iframe> /etc. elements by sending the X-Frame-Options header with all HTTP responses. The header value depends on the new configuration setting http_allow_embedding .

If you want to be able to embed the Graylog frontend in another HTML page, you most likely want to set http_allow_embedding to true . Only do this if you are aware of the implications!

Hope that helps!

Hello

Thank you for your help, There was configuration we had to adjust from our front end application we resolved this by setting

w.Header().Set(“Content-Security-Policy”, “frame-ancestors ‘self’”)

Regards,
SAM